![]() ![]() |
Dear Digg.com: I'm going to save you a million dollars with three lines of code |
Feb 16 2007, 06:08 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,892 Joined: 4-February 07 Member No.: 3 |
Posted by Oatmeal Dearest Digg,I couldn't help but notice your site has a small technical issue. It's no biggie, but I think fixing it could save you some money. I'm all about saving people money, just the other day I handed out coupons for a free trial-sized bag of bean-lard mulch. I know, I'm practically a saint. I noticed that digg can be reached through both http://www.digg.com and http://digg.com. I don't know if you're aware of this, but some of the cool kids are redirecting requests for the www version of their site to the non-www version. Why would they do such a thing? Aside from appearances, they're probably doing this because having a single, canonical version of every URL on your site improves your rankings at search engines. According to Google employee Matt Cutts: Q: What is a canonical url? Do you have to use such a weird word, anyway?I know what you're thinking: "I'm Digg, What do I care about improving rankings at the search engines? My value is based on user generated stories and community! Not ranking well in that list of ten little blue links when someone searches at google won't cause my downfall!" I agree, your future doesn't depend on it - but I'm just trying to save you a few bucks. Remember the bean lard mulch? I recently heard someone describe Google as "the new http://" - meaning Google has become the new precursor to information discovery online. Right now searching at Google for many phrases returns a mixture of www and non-www versions of Digg pages. While plenty of these pages rank well, having a canonical version could potentially make them rank better. Wouldn't you prefer it if you showed up in the number 1 spot in the search results instead of 5 or 6? The difference in click-through rates for the top three versus 4-10 are incredibly substantial. Click-throughs from Google mean more visitors to Digg from a broader audience. This audience might be inclined to click on some of your ads, meaning more money in your pocket. You could sign up for Google Sitemaps and select which version of your site is the canonical one, but there's an easier way. According to netcraft you appear to be running Apache, so you could easily fix this canonicalization problem with three lines of code in your configuration file: RewriteEngine OnSimple enough, right? Sincerely yours, Matthew Inman SEOmoz.org [img]http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/seomoz?i=hKcdCnzN[/img] [img]http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/seomoz?i=ouJGQ61z[/img] View the full article at SEOMoz |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Similar Topics
| Topic Title | Replies | Topic Starter | Views | Last Action | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
0 | RSS Aggregator | 857 | 31st January 2007 - 01:50 PM Last post by: RSS Aggregator |
|||
![]() |
0 | RSS Aggregator | 1,314 | 1st February 2007 - 08:03 PM Last post by: RSS Aggregator |
|||
![]() |
0 | RSS Aggregator | 544 | 5th February 2007 - 08:57 AM Last post by: RSS Aggregator |
|||
![]() |
0 | RSS Aggregator | 503 | 14th February 2007 - 10:10 PM Last post by: RSS Aggregator |
|||
![]() |
0 | RSS Aggregator | 373 | 15th February 2007 - 11:19 AM Last post by: RSS Aggregator |
|||
Links to this thread
| Page | Date | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| communityseo - Live Search | 22nd June 2008 - 11:41 PM | 1 |
| communityseo - Live Search | 20th August 2008 - 05:12 AM | 2 |
| register feedburner digg.com - Google-sökning | 9th November 2008 - 06:09 PM | 1 |
| seomoz canonical url - Google Search | 12th November 2008 - 09:38 AM | 1 |
| dear digg million dollars lines code - Google Search | 8th December 2008 - 04:46 AM | 1 |
| digg million dollars - Google Search | 11th December 2008 - 09:15 PM | 1 |
| digg million $ - Google Search | 24th December 2008 - 08:11 PM | 1 |
| Not Available | 26th December 2008 - 12:18 AM | 1 |
| digg million dollars 3 lines - Google Search | 1st January 2009 - 03:33 AM | 1 |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 6th January 2009 - 03:29 AM |